Area families facing new frontier in harassment
The Post and Courier
Tuesday, September 2, 2008
Recently, a group of students took unflattering cell-phone pictures of another student. They posted the photos online, along with other photos of the student's head superimposed on the bodies of barnyard animals, and sent the link to everyone whose e-mail address they knew, asking them to vote on the photos. "There was a counter on the site so you could see how many people viewed it, and it was in the hundreds," says Barbara Melton, a licensed professional counselor in Charleston. "And they actually voted on it." Finally, the students sent the link to the student herself, who was so upset and horrified that she told her parents. This is a new form of childhood harassment called cyberbullying or electronic aggression. And, like the example above, it's happening right here in the Lowcountry. "It's kind of rampant," says Melton. "Movies like 'Mean Girls' show that kids can be very cruel to each other." But gone are the days when bullies only picked on kids on the playground. Thanks to technology, they now can do it around the clock, and they often are more cruel online than in person. "It is 24-7," Melton says. "You can never shut it off." Last year, Melton and Susan Shankle co-wrote a book called "What in the World Are Your Kids Doing Online?" Melton says they wrote the book because, "we had an explosion of families that have had Internet complications." Those complications include cyberbullying. Although there isn't much research on the topic yet because it is so new, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's "Electronic Media and Youth Violence" discusses the topic and outlines what parents and educators can do about it.
iStockPhoto
By the numbers
Key findings of a 2006 poll of 1,000 kids nationwide were: --One-third of all teens (ages 12-17) and one-sixth of children ages 6-11 have had mean, threatening or embarrassing things said about them online. --10 percent of the teens and 4 percent of the younger children were threatened online with physical harm. --16 percent of the teens and preteens who were victims told no one about it. About half of children ages 6-11 told their parents. Only 30 percent of older kids told their parents. --Preteens were as likely to receive harmful messages at school (45 percent) as at home (44 percent). Older children received 30 percent of harmful messages at school and 70 percent at home.
Resources
The following Web sites offer information on cyberbullying: --www.bullying.org -- www.cyberbullying.org --www.cdc.gov/ncipc/dvp/electronic_aggression.htm --www.csriu.org or www.cyberbully.org (Center for Safe and Responsible Internet Use) --www.fightcrime.org/cyberbullying
The report estimates that up to 35 percent of young people have been the victims of electronic aggression, but researchers think the numbers are low because youngsters don't really understand what bullying is or how harmful it can be. "Fight Crime: Invest in Kids," a national, nonprofit organization of more than 3,000 police chiefs, sheriffs, prosecutors and other law-enforcement leaders, estimates that 13 million children ages 6-17 are victims of cyberbullying each year. What it is Electronic aggression can be done through any new technology, but it includes all the old methods: teasing, spreading rumors, mocking and threats. The CDC defines electronic aggression as "any type of harassment or bullying that occurs through e-mail, a chat room, instant messaging, a Web site (including blogs) or text messaging." The most common way kids ages 12-17 are harassed is via instant message (44 percent), followed by e-mail (34 percent), comments on a Web site (30 percent), text message (19 percent) and chat room (14 percent), according to the "Fight Crime" report. Most often, the comments involved dating life (59 percent) or appearance (38 percent), the report showed. "It's common for people to post things about people they used to date or the people they are dating now," says Anna Taylor, 17, a Summerville student. Why they do it Like schoolyard bullies, cyberbullies have low self-esteem and a need to boost their own egos. They can be motivated by anger or boredom or just looking to get a reaction. Often, they act or react without thinking. "Kids are not good at impulse control," Melton says. "There can be long-term consequences, but kids really don't think those things through." Online, they can be smart, cool, good-looking, funny — all the things they may not be in real life. "You can be someone else on the Internet and that's very attractive to kids," she says. Many people who bully online think they are anonymous. "A lot of times, people are pretty good at masking these kinds of things with false e-mail accounts and things like that," Melton says. "They think that if they create an online identity, it never will be traced back to them, but it can be." Kids not only create false accounts in an effort to be anonymous, but they also often use someone else's account. "They get away from thinking that these things can come back to haunt them," Melton says. "Kids need to be warned that there are so many different ways to find out who they are." Additionally, people tend to do things online that they wouldn't do in person because of "disinhibition," behavior that is less inhibited than real life, according to the Center for Safe and Responsible Internet Use. Because they don't see the victim, they don't think they have hurt anyone. "The kids who send these tend to think it's a victimless crime," says Summerville mom Jane Connelly. "But if you have ever received a mean e-mail or comment, or if your kids have, you can see how much it hurts." Connelly says she has encouraged her children to think about the recipient before sending anything online or on their cell phones. "It's the old, 'How would you feel?' question," she says. "They know I expect them to treat people with respect, whether it's in person or online."
Online intimidation
Flaming: Online fights using electronic messages with angry and vulgar language. Harassment: Repeatedly sending nasty, mean messages. Denigration: Sending or posting gossip or rumors about a person to damage his/her reputation or friendships. Impersonation: Pretending to be someone else and sending or posting material to get that person in trouble or danger or to damage that person's reputation, friendships. Exclusion: Intentionally and cruelly excluding someone from an online group.
- "Cyberbullying and Cyberthreats: Responding to the Challenge of Online Social Aggression, Threats, and Distress" by N.E. Willard
Brenda Rindge can be reached at 937-5713 or brindge@postandcourier.com.
|
Posted by WSM on September 2, 2008 at 11:42 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Ummmm...and people's lives will end with this?
Whatever happened to the good old days of settling a score at wrestling or boxing practice, even if you weren't a member of the team?
Your face was posted on a barnyard animal? What's the difference between that and someone drawing a charicature of the boss on a toilet stall wall at work? Both are juvenile. Both show the intellectual limits of the "author." So...what's the response?
The societal response should be one that already exists towards toilet poets: ridicule and scorn. The fact that it takes place over the internet and by way of electrons as opposed to ink should make little diffrence. It should be a social black mark to take outhouse activism to the 21st Century.
Secondly, slanderous postings like this...if posted on an internet message board or forum...generally violate the service provider's terms of use, and can be deleted without much issue.
That is, unless it is "political speech," and then it seems that you can post any falsehoods and distortions all day long. Kind of like: The Daily Kos, MoveOn.Org, etc.
Posted by mkris on September 2, 2008 at 12:12 p.m. (Suggest removal)
RE: That is, unless it is "political speech," and then it seems that you can post any falsehoods and distortions all day long. Kind of like: The Daily Kos, MoveOn.Org, etc.
Good post until the last bit. It just became another rant.