Connect with us:   Subscribe to the paper  |   View the mobile edition  |   Get daily e-mail news  |   Get mobile alerts  |   Share your photos  |   Report news  |   Place an ad  |   Contact us


Fees a downright taxing subject

The Post and Courier
Friday, October 10, 2008


Photo of Brian Hicks

One of the great things about Mounte Pleasante is that town officials really know how to hold the line on taxes. Don't have to read their lips — they haven't raised property taxes in 16 years.

Now, they are spiking the living daylights out of their fees. But hey, those aren't taxes. Just ask any politician.

Fees are completely voluntary, they'll tell you. Nobody pays them unless they want additional services — luxuries like electricity, plumbing, or a place to park while they walk across the Cooper River bridge.

You know, taxpayers have already paid $630 million for that elevated walking path. Would it be too much to ask for a couple of VIP parking passes?

The Towne administrator has suggested a ban on parking along Patriots Point Boulevard, where most bridge walkers now leave their cars. In exchange, he proposes that folks park at the soon-to-open Memorial Waterfront Park and pay $1 an hour.

More Hicks

To read previous columns by Brian Hicks, go to Charleston.net/hicks.

To give you an idea of how steep that is, that's 25 percent higher than parking in downtown Charleston.

That's a heck of a way to get into the pay-to-park business.

There has never been paid parking in Mounte Pleasante public lots; that's the glory of being a suburban town.

In fact, back when they were debating where to put the Hunley museum, it was one of the selling points. If they put it in Charleston, the argument went, folks would have to pay extra for parking.

OK, Patriots Point recently started charging $3 to park there, but you can't put that on Mounte Pleasante.

Patriots Point is a quasi-state agency. And their money goes for maintenance on those four ships, something the state's not exactly been keeping up with. (The state, it seems, is in the same boat as the town.)

Councilman Joe Bustos calls this a slippery slope, and he's got a point. Are they next going to charge for parking at Towne Centre? How about Shem Creek? Maybe put a toll gate at Remley's Point. That's the ticket.

You can argue that it costs money to get into county parks, too, but those are all flat fees. The James Island County Park doesn't charge by the hour, like some seedy motel.

Town officials say they need the parking money to keep up with maintenance at the new park.

Bustos says the town shouldn't build things it can't afford to keep up. That's just adding an additional burden to the ever-shrinking tax base.

Maybe, Bustos says, the town should dip into its TIF district funds (that's tax increment financing for the bureaucratically challenged) to maintain the park until the sun rises on the economy once again.

Don't put it on the people. They might, in turn, just tell town officials to take a longer walk off their new long pier.

Between raising the utility franchise, stormwater fees and this, Bustos says the camel's back might be ready to break.

"Each one, by itself, isn't a big amount of money," Bustos says. "Put them all together, and it starts to add up."

Some officials will tell you that it's no big deal; they aren't raising taxes — remember, they haven't done it in 16 years. That's how people get elected to office these days, from little towns to the White House. They promise they won't raise taxes, which is an irresponsible point of view from a management standpoint. Inflation affects government, too.

To live off their current incomes, governments have to cut existing services, or sneak by tax increases they call "fees." Bustos will tell you this is the sort of thing that will nickel-and-dime folks to death.

But this pay-to park business also opens up a lucrative new revenue stream for a town that doesn't want to raise taxes. The city of Charleston makes a lot of money off parking, and about four times as much off tickets. Maybe Mounte Pleasante is on to something.

And there's something else. If it walks like a tax, talks like a tax and spends like a tax, it's a tax.

Rather than pay that new tax, some folks might decide to take their long walks in a spot where there is a view just as nice, and the parking is cheaper — say, The Battery.

Reach Brian Hicks at 937-5561 or bhicks@postandcourier.com.







Latest local stories




Sponsored Links


Notice about comments:
Charleston.net is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Charleston.net does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not charleston.net. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "suggest removal" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
Full terms and conditions can be read here.

Comments

This article has  2 comment(s)

Posted by mac0cm4 on October 10, 2008 at 1:40 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Irresponsible government. Had they raised taxes a small amount each year to cover increases in their expenditures, etc, instead of relying on the impact fees they charged new construction, then perhaps they'd not have to consider nickel and dimeing their citizens to death. The other alternative is a larger tax increase. They failed to look at the big picture and keep a wary eye on the future.



Posted by southbel on October 10, 2008 at 4:33 p.m. (Suggest removal)

I think the Town Council failed to realize the impact of the economy as they were planning several big projects, even after the housing market slowed to a crawl and their projected revenue was projected to be significantly less than needed for these projects. The Coleman Boulevard improvement, the Shem Creek purchase with eventual improvements and this waterfront park with increased and rather grandiose improvements.

The Town of Mount Pleasant has decided to cut in services or rather, freeze, services but not slow large spending projects. They knew two years ago that the housing market slow down would impact revenue and still continued with the very large scale projects. Now we are expected to pay for these large scale expenditures? Hmmm...I find that rather irresponsible.

The Town's argument is that they will continue with these large projects because they project that the economy and housing market will be back to right where is was before (2004-2005 levels) in about three years. I think this is completely unrealistic and not only will we, as the taxpayers, have to continue to pay these continued increases in fees, but I also predict we will see an increase in taxes.

Yes, all of these improvements make Mount Pleasant a wonderful place to live. They really do. However, at some point, like so many families have done with their own personal budgets, it's time to cut the fat a bit and just slow down on the superfluous projects that are simply not necessary to the citizens of the town.




(Requires free registration.)

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

Search Charleston.Net Archives for Latest News


Charleston.Net Customer Care | Subscribe to Paper, Register for email news updates, manage your online account, place a classified ad, or contact us




Charleston.net logo

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 the Evening Post Publishing Co.

Use of this site signifies your agreement to the Terms of service, Privacy policy and our Parental consent form. (Updated 2/9/2007)