Connect with us:   Subscribe to the paper  |   View the mobile edition  |   Get daily e-mail news  |   Get mobile alerts  |   Share your photos  |   Report news  |   Place an ad  |   Contact us


Berkeley budget raises pay, not taxes

Supervisor proposes using sales tax revenue for capital projects

BY ANDY PARAS
The Post and Courier
Tuesday, May 20, 2008


MONCKS CORNER — Berkeley County staff proposed a $57.3 million budget Monday that includes a pay increase for employees without raising taxes.

Officials said the estimated expenditures in 2008-09 will represent a 0.7 percent decrease from this year's budget, though they estimate having to use about $1.3 million from the fund balance to balance the budget.

County Finance Director Kace Smith said that even though they're budgeting to use the county's savings, that doesn't mean they will.

Last year, the county estimated it would have to use about $2.7 million of its savings to balance the budget but instead came in $193,000 under budget without using any savings.

The proposal includes a 2.85 percent cost-of-living raise for all employees and a 2 percent increase in merit raises.

Smith and Supervisor Dan Davis also proposed using 29 percent of the county's optional sales tax revenue for a capital improvements plan that will fund the widening of U.S. Highway 17A, the renovation of the jail, and improvements to the Jedburg Road overpass on Interstate 26.

Davis said using the money would allow the county to make much-needed improvements without having to borrow money or raise taxes.

Council pledged a decade ago to use all tax revenue toward property tax relief, but Davis said the revenue from the sales tax grows so much each year — about 10 percent — that taxpayers won't see much of a difference, if at all, in the amount they paid this year.

Councilmen were mostly mum on the issue during the meeting, but the majority said afterward that they have some issues with Davis' proposal, which could lead to a showdown when it comes time to vote on the budget.

Councilman Dennis Fish said using the sales tax revenue represents a tax increase, but he said he doesn't have an alternative solution to funding the capital improvements.

Councilman Tim Callanan said he's for using the tax revenue but he doesn't feel they need to take the entire 29 percent.

Councilmen discussed at length what to do with Cypress Gardens, the county-owned park that in 2008 accrued a $653,000 debt that has not been addressed in last year's or this year's budgets.

Davis said he plans to make a recommendation on that debt later this year. The proposed budget includes ways to decrease the park's annual costs to about $270,000.

Davis said he's committed to keeping the park open. He and councilmen discussed adding some features over time to make the park more educational.

The council meets at 6 tonight in the supervisor's conference room to discuss the proposed Water and Sanitation budget.

Reach Andy Paras at 745-5891 or aparas@postandcourier.com.




Article tools




Latest local stories




Sponsored Links


Notice about comments:
Charleston.net is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Charleston.net does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not charleston.net. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "suggest removal" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
Full terms and conditions can be read here.

Comments

This article has  3 comment(s)

Posted by smalltownrumor on May 20, 2008 at 3:34 p.m. (Suggest removal)

When the local option sales tax was first placed before the voters of Berkeley County, it was soundly defeated. The next time it appeared on the ballot, it succeeded only after council vowed to use the entire 100% of the proceeds for property tax relief. Now, I learn that BC government plans to take back 29% of these proceeds and place the money into the general fund to balance the budget. Mr. Davis insists this will not mean a tax increase. Well folks, I went to school back when adding and subtracting numbers gave you another definite number. If Mr. Davis uses 29% of the proceeds of the local option for spending and not property tax relief, who's going to make up the difference on our property tax bills? I know, the taxpayer. So, as a public service I would like to explain this to Mr. Davis by saying, "When you take away 29% of the property tax relief promise and the taxpayer has to make up that difference out of his own pocket, that's called a tax increase." I do hope this PSA has been helpful.



Posted by jefferymaier on May 20, 2008 at 6:36 p.m. (Suggest removal)

What an arrogant weasel Davis is. First here goes back on his campaign promise to put a referendum on the ballot to eliminate the elected supervisor position, and now he's passing off a tax increase as a good thing for tax payers.



Posted by CountryGirl on May 21, 2008 at 12:27 a.m. (Suggest removal)

He's a politician...did you expect honesty?....especially in Berkeley County...get real people!!




(Requires free registration.)

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

Search Charleston.Net Archives for Latest News


Charleston.Net Customer Care | Subscribe to Paper, Register for email news updates, manage your online account, place a classified ad, or contact us




Charleston.net logo

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 the Evening Post Publishing Co.

Use of this site signifies your agreement to the Terms of service, Privacy policy and our Parental consent form. (Updated 2/9/2007)