Connect with us:   Subscribe to the paper  |   View the mobile edition  |   Get daily e-mail news  |   Get mobile alerts  |   Share your photos  |   Report news  |   Place an ad  |   Contact us


North Charleston City Council votes not to ban smoking

The Post and Courier
Wednesday, May 14, 2008


North Charleston City Council voted 6-4 not to ban smoking in public places.

Council, meeting as the Committee of the Whole to discuss the issue, made the decision at the end of a lengthy discussion that ultimately rested on business owners and their rights.

"I believe as a government we have gone to the nth degree of involving ourselves in business decisions," said Mayor Keith Summey, who recently quit smoking. "I just don't believe we should be interjecting ourselves (in those decisions)."

Councilwoman Dorothy Williams, who does not smoke, agreed.

"I don't believe we should dictate to businesses," said Williams, who also didn't like the 2 a.m. bar-closing mandate the city passed last fall. "If you don't want to go into an establishment, don't go."

Councilman Ed Astle, a former smoker of 22 years, sided with the majority.

"It's not our place to tell private businesses how to operate," Astle said.

On the opposite end of the argument was Councilman Steve Ayer.

"I support banning it outright," the non-smoker said. "We dictated to the bars that they had to shut down at 2 o'clock in the morning. We slapped everybody in the face with that."

Charleston, Mount Pleasant and Sullivan's Island have passed bans on indoor smoking in public places, and Councilman Bob King believes North Charleston should not be the only major jurisdiction left in the metro area that does not have a smoking ban.

King wanted to set parameters on smoking in public places, but his ideas were snuffed out.

"A row of plants is not a barrier," said Councilman Bobby Jameson, referring to some businesses that separate smoking and non-smoking sections. "We have an obligation to protect non-smokers where we believe we have a health hazard."

Dan Carrigan, executive director of the Smoke Free Action Network that lobbies for smoke-free workplaces across the state, urged council to adopt the smoking ban.

"Everyone has a right to breathe clean air," Carrigan said, citing study after study that second-hand smoke is harmful.

Berenice Moreno is one of those people he is trying to protect. She doesn't smoke, but she waits tables in a North Charleston restaurant that allows smoking.

"The smoke bothers me a little," the North Charleston resident said. "I would not have a problem with not allowing smoking."

Daniel Boone manages another restaurant in North Charleston. He doesn't smoke but he thinks if someone wants to, it's his or her right.

"Nobody twists your arm to come into a place to eat," Boone said.

"It's an infringement on a person's choice," said Phil Lugo, a smoker and resident in Olde North Charleston near Park Circle. "They should not tell us what to do."

North Charleston considered a ban on smoking in public places such as restaurants and bars after the state Supreme Court ruled unanimously in March that itÂ’s OK for local governments to pass bans on indoor smoking in public places.

Those voting to deny the ban besides Astle, Summey, Williams were Councilmen Michael Brown, Sam Hart and Kurt Taylor.

Councilwoman Phoebe Miller voted with Ayer, Jameson and King against denying the ban. Councilwoman Rhonda Jerome left the meeting before the vote.

Reach Warren Wise at 745-5850 or wwise@postandcourier.com.




Article tools




Latest local stories





Sponsored Links


Notice about comments:
Charleston.net is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Charleston.net does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not charleston.net. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "suggest removal" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
Full terms and conditions can be read here.

Comments

This article has  3 comment(s)

Posted by jmw29410 on May 14, 2008 at 8:56 p.m. (Suggest removal)

I hope N Chas does not follow this trend like a bunch of lemmings. We have too much legislated morality. If a business chooses to be smoker hostile, that is their business... and their lost business.

Remember folks: "F' the Ban - Light Up For Freedom Of Choice!"



Posted by summerville_guy on May 14, 2008 at 10:43 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Well jmw, judging by your comments, you are obviously a smoker. You are used to smelling smoke, so it doesn't bother you. So, I would not expect you to understand that for nonsmokers like myself, it is really aggravating to have to walk through smoke in restaurants and other public places. I completely understand the whole argument about freedom of choice and I understand that I could simply stay away from businesses that allow smoking. However, it is my opinion that smoking in a public place is unfair to people who choose not to smoke but have to breathe it in anyway.

I am disappointed in the North Charleston City Council.



Posted by geekguy2008 on May 14, 2008 at 11 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Lung Biscuits aren't the only thing smokers are going to continue to cough up. More taxes are being put on cigs to give health care to all the little raisins out there.




(Requires free registration.)

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

Search Charleston.Net Archives for Latest News


Charleston.Net Customer Care | Subscribe to Paper, Register for email news updates, manage your online account, place a classified ad, or contact us




Charleston.net logo

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 the Evening Post Publishing Co.

Use of this site signifies your agreement to the Terms of service, Privacy policy and our Parental consent form. (Updated 2/9/2007)