Panel off to slow start in school funds debate
The Post and Courier
Wednesday, July 23, 2008
COLUMBIA — Legislators procrastinated Tuesday instead of getting down to work rewriting the state education funding formula, although members of a study committee refocused efforts on the dividing issue. Historically, the Legislature has not made progress in changing the way South Carolina pays to educate children because a new formula will only redivide the same dollars, and no one wants to go home with less money. "It would be my recommendation we grab a big, white, blank sheet of paper," House Majority Leader Jim Merrill of Daniel Island said to his colleagues on the Education Finance Act Study Committee. Merrill said the committee was "chasing our tail" after members spent more than an hour laying out philosophical agendas and getting sidetracked on issues such as offering better incentives to teachers. Merrill said it was time for legislators to put proposals on the table. From the start, though, Rep. Jeff Duncan, a Laurens Republican and committee chairman, said it was going to be tough to bring all the sides together and deal with the high-stakes problems that also call things such as equity and South Carolina's competitiveness into the mix. "One thing I have sensed is how monumental and overwhelming this task is. It is Herculean, really," Duncan said when preparing for the meeting. Duncan said some of the keys to reform will be giving school districts flexibility to design programs, handing over more local control on revenue and looking at funding schools on a per-child basis. Also, he said, the committee could investigate whether to fund education 100 percent by the state, eliminating the 30 percent local contribution. Rep. Annette Young, R-Summerville, bristled at the suggestion. To do that, she said, would mean a tax increase. Duncan asked the committee to meet every two weeks through the end of November when House Speaker Bobby Harrell called for the committee to release a report about its findings and recommendations before the start of the 2009 session. The matter is so complex and so important that Duncan said he is not sure the committee will be able to come to any conclusions. The House committee has been meeting since December 2007 and has been collecting testimony up to this point. During the next meeting, scheduled for Aug. 5, Duncan said he would bring the first proposal and encouraged the committee members to do the same. A similar effort in the Senate is scheduled to resume next month. That panel has been meeting since June 2006 with no proposed solutions.
Reach Yvonne Wenger at 803-799-9051 or ywenger@postandcourier.com.
|
Posted by Early on July 23, 2008 at 8:24 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Not related but just wanted to bring this up.
Wadmalaw school parents are threatening to hold their children from school if the CCSD does not replace the principle, seems like an important article but guess it didn't make it here. Why would ANY parent use their children as a weapon? How will this benefit your child?
Posted by lou9 on July 23, 2008 at 10:03 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Assign a dollar figure per pupil statewide regardless of where they live, raise the sales tax another 1 or 2 percent and let the state take over fully funding education. They can't do much worse than these tax and waste school districts. Let the dollars assigned to the student go with him/her regardless of whether they go to private, public, or home school. Breaking up the monopoly that public education has on our tax dollars will make them have to improve instead of giving excuses and raising taxes.