Whether art or vandalism is in the eye of the beholder
Some paint with permission, others are outlaws
The Post and Courier
Saturday, August 16, 2008
Tyrone Walker The Post and Courier
Jermaine Pinckney of James Island uses his cell phone to get word out about a graffiti mural painted on the back of a building on Folly Road. The 10 panels, painted with permission, draw steady traffic.
Tyrone Walker The Post and Courier
A mural painted by Doug 'The Sheepman' Panzone graces the College of Charleston's freshmen dorm complex. Painted on the inner wall of the complex, it cannot be seen from the street, thus passing Board of Architectural Review muster.
Video
Sandy Logan, VP LS3P Associates, talks about the mural College of Charleston commissioned from mural artist, Doug Panzone. Watch »
Tag, you're it. If you're a graffiti artist. Spray-paint street art is the underground rebel art, getting popular recognition as police and local communities try to wipe out the "tagging" vandalism that inspires it. While the city of Charleston cracks down on vandals defacing historic buildings such as McLeod Plantation, colorful emblems and fresco-like fantasy figure landscapes are getting shipped across country — cell phone to cell phone, Facebook to Facebook, Web site to Web site. The artists have their roots in tagging, the act of scrawling initials, symbols or images across any blank wall as a way of marking territory or saying, "look at me, look at what I did." The best of them work with property owners' permission. But not all of them do. For some sprayers, the thrill is charged with the in-your-face rush of getting away with it. They try to put their mark on the most brazen spot possible. Others are working legally, but partly because of the stigma, they keep their heads down, and many of their fans don't know who they are. But the fan base, mostly young people, is growing. They hunt out walls for the latest find, snapping a cell phone photo and hitting the send button. That Internet exposure has more people hitting town to gape for themselves. Vandalism is giving way to a vanguard. "It's a double-edged sword," Charleston Police Cpl. Ed Robinson said . "You're talking about a commissioned piece of art, whether it looks like graf-fiti or not. Does it promote graffiti? I would assume it does. But it would also give them ways to express themselves legally." Destination wall Ten wall panels behind the Buffalo South shopping center on Folly Road are now a counterculture icon, painted with images such as a river landscape and a woman with dark, haunting eyes. On a recent midweek, more than a half dozen cars turned off the road to cruise past it in less than a half hour. Why? "One word: Amazing," Jermaine Pinckney, 20, of James Island, said as he held up his cell phone background image of the dark-eyed woman with the wall mural behind him. He sent that image to friends across the state after his cousin took him to see it. Mary Ann Sullivan of Greenville didn't really want to drive out Folly Road and was a little intimidated at driving behind the building. But her daughter, Courtney Sullivan, had heard about it as a student at College of Charleston. Courtney said her mom had to see this. Then mom had Courtney turn around and drive by a few more times. "It's a gallery in itself," Mary Ann Sullivan said. That kind of attention is pushing people like Doug "The Sheepman" Panzone, who did the mural, into the mainstream — even as he does his best to stay out of it. Besides a brief e-mail, Panzone, of Mount Pleasant, didn't respond to requests for interviews for this story. "It's a subculture movement growing exponentially," Seth Curcio, Redux Contemporary Art Center director, said. He has hosted an exhibit by Panzone, his friend. "Graffiti was born as a form of rebellion," Curcio said. "We started trying to refine the skills, how to paint with aerosol, working intuitively, being able to cover a huge amount of space in a short length of time. The interest is in pushing it as far as you can using that tool." Most illegal graffiti that Charleston police see wouldn't qualify as art, Robinson said. It's symbol tags. Panzone worked with the property owner's permission, but others are spraying across the misdemeanor line. The tag Last year, after graffiti tags spiked to nearly 300 per month, Charleston Police went after the vandals and made about a dozen arrests. Since then, incidents have dropped to fewer than 100 per month, Robinson said. Vandal or not, graffiti is scribbling its way into popular expression. After a 9-year-old trying to cross Ladson Road in Summerville was killed by a hit and run driver in July, roadside mourners set out a wreath and other symbols on the curb where it happened. Some also spray-painted messages to the victim. Keeping the art underground is part of the mystique for the artists and audience, Brian Muller, 24, of Charleston, said. "You do have to go 'behind the building' to see it. Only people in the know, know about it." But it's not staying underground. Muller is one of the founders of tagrecord.com, an online repository for artistic graffiti imagery. The Web site allows people to post and view on-the-street exhibits, legal or not. "We vociferously oppose illegal graffiti. If it's illegal, it shouldn't have been done. It is, nonetheless, art, and as such can be recorded," Muller said. The site urges opening more legitimate venues. Just recently created, the site already is getting a few hundred hits per day. They're getting out-of-town submissions and thinking the site might go national. The site includes a how-to on using non-destructive graffiti such as vinyl stickers. Muller also is beginning to see digital graffiti — literally photos of bare walls digitized on a computer, creating complex images that couldn't be done in spray paint. The mainstream One of the people who has stumbled across the Buffalo South mural is Sandy Logan, vice president of the design firm LS3P Associates. He first saw it while doing early design work for the new College of Charleston freshmen dorm complex. He knew he wanted something like that. He didn't have a concern over it being considered graffiti. "It's a language in the spirit of the students. It would just do so much for the spirit if you could wake up in the morning and see that rather than a blank wall," he said. Logan had to convince the Board of Architectural Review in a city that has a law restricting wall art visible from the street. He and Panzone worked out a vast mural where images of the school's "left brain" and "right brain" academic departments merge. It was painted on the inner wall of the complex; it can't be seen from the road. The Buffalo South building owner, Ken Berlinsky, said Panzone approached him about doing the 10-panel mural on the back wall because Panzone wanted room to practice large scale. Berlinsky agreed, for a telling reason — he wanted to do something about the taggers' scribblings that had been defacing the wall. "I figured they would respect each other," he said. "And I'd rather have something pretty back there instead of graffiti."
Reach Bo Petersen at 745-5852 or bpetersen@postandcourier.com.
|
Posted by jeff61 on August 16, 2008 at 7:34 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Did that young man paint that? I hope he can find work where he can put his talent to use.
Posted by shoelaces on August 16, 2008 at 8:31 a.m. (Suggest removal)
There was an article a few weeks ago when McLeod was tagged. I thought then that someone should find a way to make money off this "art." It looks like some people are doing just that.
Whether you like the graffiti or not this looks like a great opportunity for someone to start a business and really make some money. I am sure there will still be punks who do it just for kicks but the smart ones will earn a lot of money for this. LIke it or not it is art.
Posted by Riptide on August 16, 2008 at 9:07 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Bo Peterson, I suggest you give some thought to your title. If I came by and spray painted your car or house without your permission I would guarantee you wouldn’t call it art.
Words have meaning. What is on the wall of that building is a mural. It’s not graffiti art. When I hear the word graffiti the word has a clear definition. Graffiti is something placed on the surface of someone’s property without the permission of the owner. I get the impression from reading this article that graffiti art is an attempt to give legitimacy to these people that has no respect for property or property rights.
Let’s try to separate vandals and from the artists. Words still have meaning. Art, murals, and graffiti are clearly different words with their own definitions.
Posted by jeff61 on August 16, 2008 at 9:18 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I totaly agree Rip,, and I hope the young featured here as not involved in that prior to this.
Posted by mac0cm4 on August 16, 2008 at 9:24 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Riptide must be the one who feels he can define art. Art is objective - it's in the eye of the beholder, and in the eye of the creator. Whether it's welcome or not, is the issue in the article that determines whether it's art or vandalism.
Posted by jeff61 on August 16, 2008 at 9:32 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I think Rip defined the difference quite well.. I do not see where he disputed that "graffiti" could not be art, but to spray paint things with out permission is vandalism.
I take it mac you are a graffiti artist???? Which is nothing more then a spray paint terrorist
Posted by americanheretic on August 16, 2008 at 9:55 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Graffiti jerks haven't got the guts to learn to paint,just little moma's boys making baby scribbles all over town. Look around you,is this what you want your city to look like?
Who gets to pay for the damage?
Posted by iceman1978 on August 16, 2008 at 10:10 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I've said it before and I'll say it again. Graffiti is a sign that the neighborhood is in decline.
Posted by Clamps80 on August 16, 2008 at 11:14 a.m. (Suggest removal)
The mural behind Buffalo South has been there for years, it's nothing new.
Posted by 512c on August 16, 2008 at 6:18 p.m. (Suggest removal)
What a schizophrenic culture we are. We have these "great" old buildings down town, that stem from a culture that Adolf Loos would consider criminal, in their pasting symbols all over the structure. Even as David Leatherbarrow defines structure, or structural ornament our "classic" buildings (while I admire them, and relish exploring these in detail as I crawl around their guts to renovate or reinovate them I still say the culture has lost most if not all reference to what these ornaments stood for.) represent many lost meanings.
These Graffiti (little graphic in Italian) artist are expressing a direct reflection of their culture. While, I don't believe every blank canvas is a template for exposure, I do admire most Graffiti more than most Corinthian, Doric, pendant of acanthus leaved Columns.
Posted by drp7773 on August 17, 2008 at 8:38 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Get caught, lose both hands....problem solved .trash is as trash does.
Posted by bmuller on August 17, 2008 at 3:48 p.m. (Suggest removal)
The legality of a work has nothing to do with its qualification as art. Paint a picture on your wall - legal art. Paint the same picture on someone else's wall - illegal art. While most graffiti may be illegal - and yes, therefore "bad", malevolent, etc. - it is still, nonetheless, art.